The thing is, writers can be inordinately pretentious and blissfully unaware of the fact. Part of the whole living in your head while trying to describe the most banal processes using language that elevates them to art will do that to you, I guess.
I’m reading The Girls now and had just finished Sweetbitter before it. I loved the latter and struggled with the former at first, before giving myself over to the strangely familiar creepiness of the story. Both are debut novels by pretty young blonde women. Both are firmly evocative of a particular time and place—California in the late ‘60s and New York City in the early oughts. And, both showcase prose that is sometimes pretentious to the point of hilarity.
Don’t get me wrong, there’s some great writing in these books. The authors are nothing if not exquisitely attentive to their craft. It’s just that as I read, my eyes occasionally rolled back into the universal expression for “Girl, get over yourself!”
Anyway, this parody in The Millions of Natalie Portman and Jonathan Safran Foer’s e-mail exchange for T The New York Times Style Magazine in which the hyper-educated actress and Cormac McCarthy trade brilliant observations, cracked me up, precisely because it’s really not that farfetched. Writers who are allowed to indulge their bombast without check (i.e., a strong editor with a finely sharpened red pencil) can very quickly veer into self-parody.
Personally, I don’t mind a little purple mixed in with the black ink, but it is one of the things that authors need to be vigilant about. A momentary lapse is forgivable and even endearing, too many and you’re headed for the rejection pile.
Can you think of any fun examples of affected, self-important writing you’ve seen recently?

July 26, 2016
Miriam

Telegraph Avenue. I waited ages to read it, and couldn’t get through the first 100 pages. It’s like somebody let Chabon off the leash; watching helplessly as he barrelled into a homeware store, smashing everything in sight. What it needed was for somebody to rein him in. Perhaps he’s reached that point in his career where an editor simply has no real input. Very sad.
Happens more often than you’d think, especially with established, successful authors. Will steer clear of that one.
That was frankly what chased me away from Arundati Roy’s first (and massively acclaimed) book-the feeling that she’d been taking a seminar on Creative Exposition and was devoting large chunks of space to info-dump description just to impress her fellow attendees. (Even in this she was comparatively restrained alongside Thomas Wolfe) I think a lot of editors interpret this as Passionate Devotion To Your Craft… Reminds me more of those wide-range hip-hop divas who can’t get through a holiday cover of Frosty The Snowman without a long intermezzo of histrionic wails to demonstrate that they really, really, BELIEVE in this song!!!! Which is why I avoid Literary Fiction like the plague, both at home and in my secluded mountaintop laboratory…