3

Your platform (not your book’s)

Readers, by now I’m sure you’re all aware of the importance of an author’s platform (and probably sick of hearing about it), nevertheless, It’s a message that authors thankfully seem to be hearing from the start of their writing careers. Case in point: at a recent conference, I led a workshop on query letters and when I brought up how to cite one’s platform, the collective groans from the audience told me they were all well aware of the platform mandate!

Yet even so, I read a blogpost this morning on platform by fellow agent Eric Smith that raised an excellent point worth sharing: Make sure you’re building your platform for you, the author, and NOT for your book. In other words, when you set up a website/blog/Twitter feed, it should be in the service of your career as an author, not for the specific book or project that you’re trying to promote. It’s a particularly important distinction for writers looking for representation, because while we’re obviously interested in the specific project, we’re just as interested in you as an author whose career we can build with multiple books.

Lest you think the advice here is obvious, like Eric, I’ve seen writers make the mistake all the time, particularly thriller and fantasy/sci-fi writers. Fortunately, Eric provides an excellent list of authors that have done a great job of building their author platforms. If you’re struggling with how to set up that author platform, especially if you only have one book in the works, check them out for sure.

3 Responses to Your platform (not your book’s)

  1. Kevin A. Lewis says:

    Now THAT was a smart post! (Eric’s, via your own, of course) The whole window of time in re you’re-not-even-signed-who-do-you-think-is-reading-this-dude is something that isn’t even brought up much. Once you have an actual book with a website address on the back and a reason to care between the covers… Then you can play with this stuff with some effect. Onwards thru the fog!

  2. Rhonda Eason says:

    This is a useful post. Unfortunately, I’ve learned this after I’ve set up a website in support of my memoir and included this information in my proposal. (Egg on face.) However, as a saving grace, I also have an author website and my other social media does not reference the upcoming memoir or its platform. (Also, the site doesn’t reference that it’s named after an upcoming memoir so it can be a standalone website.) I’ll remember this information going forward. Good info!

  3. GH Eckel says:

    That’s a great point, John. I think, however, the real magic in social media is the “social” part. If you have 11,000 people following you but none really communicate with you, I would suspect the 11k is kind of meaningless. I have 20k and perhaps 2k DM with me personally on Twitter. So, is my platform 20k or really 2k? If you’re James Dashner, 20k is probably the better number. If you’re a first-timer, I suspect 2k is the better number. Nevertheless, 2k is better than 0k. :-)

    GH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>