Category Archives: scandal

3

Remembering Woody

Found this reading list in The Guardian today from an author for whom I have deeply mixed feelings—yep, it’s the Woodman, doing a typically odd bit of press in advance of his new movie.

Back in middle and high school, I absolutely loved Woody Allen. Sleeper and Bananas were two of the funniest movies I’d ever seen, plus Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (a little confusing to a sixth grader, but no less fun). Yet nothing cracked me up as much as his short story collection Side Effects—one of the few books I literally read to pieces. The opening story “Remembering Needleman” probably influenced my high school creative writing more than any other work—which didn’t always fly so well, especially in a certain 19th century lit class…

And then, the Soon Yi news broke. Man, wasn’t that a huge deal? I remember being pretty creeped out by the news, not least because growing up in Manhattan I had friends who went to school with some of Mia’s kids. And yet, when I got an invite to see Woody play the clarinet soon after, did I turn it down? Nope, sat at a table right near the front—even waited afterward to see him get into his car.

Time and apparent fidelity to Soon Yi have certainly helped Woody’s rep, but they haven’t exactly exonerated him. And it’s pretty depressing to see two of his book picks are Catcher in the Rye (misunderstood outsider) and a bio of Elia Kazan (persecuted auteur), as if he still sees himself as a victim. Still, I have a huge soft spot for some of his later movies like Everyone Says I Love You and Match Point. And when his most recent story collection Mere Anarchy came out, I faithfully got my copy.

So I’m still pretty torn about Woody. What do you think? Am I cutting the man too much slack? Or is this a question of drawing a line between the author and his work? Do you make similar distinctions for other controversial authors?

Chasing ambulances

by Miriam

Every once in a while a celebrity news story morphs into a veritable hydra-headed monster of a tabloid saga. And, given my love for that particular brand of infotainment, I am usually sucked in right along with the other readers of Us Weekly, People, and, yes, Star. So, you know I’ve been bouncing from one blog to another for the last couple of weeks following the supernova of a meltdown that is the Tiger Woods saga. Same thing happened with the Eliot Spitzer, Mark Sanford and John Edwards gossip fests. The rubber necking fascination for grown men behaving badly never seems to wane, despite the fact that at this point it seems more the norm than the exception. Fame/Money + Unbridled Ego = Tabloid story in the making.

So, whenever one of these events turns into the usual circus, my colleagues and I immediately think “Is there a book in this?” And, of course, there usually is. In fact, there are usually 10 books. So, how do you decide whether to jump on the ambulance chasing wagon, track down a writer and loose them on the story or take a chance on the “insider” account by one of the members of the disgraced figure’s entourage, his ex-whatever, or his second grade teacher or simply keep watching from afar. The answer is tricky and it depends on what kind of agent/agency you are.

Generally speaking, we take on books that we think we’re going to be able to sell because we don’t get paid for our efforts unless we do. Given that simple premise, it doesn’t make sense to run through hoops in order to try to make a book about one of these scandals happen unless (a) that book is going to offer revelations that are truly not to be found in the 24/7 coverage by blogs, magazines, newspapers, and tv shows (b) there is serious analysis of the situation and its more universal implications by a writer who has strong credentials and who is not just going to do a clip job restating the obvious and (c) one of the main players is willing to sell out his mother for a book deal and really does know where the bodies are buried. Ultimately, though, it’s one thing to be titillated by these kinds of stories while eating your Cheerios and quite another to spend the time, energy and dedication it takes to get a book published on a narrative that will soon be supplanted by the next celebrity/politician/sports star behaving badly. And, sometimes, despite the potential monetary windfall, the subject is just too distasteful to pursue–I don’t think anyone here would have repped OJ Simpson’s book (except perhaps Jim), even though we all would strenuously defend an agent’s choice to do so.

If you were agents would you try to sell a Tiger Woods book right now?