This afternoon, a group of us were sitting around our offices discussing how the editor’s role continues to change as our business evolves, and I thought I would share with you some of our thoughts.
Years ago, the primary role of the editor was to work with the author to make the book better in anticipation of its publication. Well known examples from the past include: Maxwell Perkins, Bob Gottlieb, Ellis Amburn, Jack Shoemaker, Judith Jones and many, many more. These editors literally spent night and day with their authors until they had a polished, publishable manuscript.
Over the years, however, as publishing became more of a “bottom line” business, these editors started disappearing and those who were left had the primary responsibility of acquiring manuscripts. The actual editing, if it was done at all, was farmed out to freelancers, a number of whom were solid, working editors who had been let go by major publishers in waves of acquisition and downsizing.
Today, there seems to be a new breed of editor—the person who acts as both editor and publisher and oftentimes has a publishing imprint with his or her name on it. These people are responsible for everything—the book acquisition, the editing, the marketing and publicity, etc. In fact, the only thing they aren’t responsible for themselves is probably selling the books into the accounts. They are, however, responsible for the bottom line of their imprint, much as a publisher is. Examples of these editors include Sarah Crichton (Farrar, Straus & Giroux), Margaret McElderry (Simon & Schuster) and Amy Einhorn (Flatiron/Macmillan).
We are all curious about what the next editor evolution will be. I would love to know what you think about all this and what your experience with editors has been.