<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m in the mood for&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/08/im-in-the-mood-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/08/im-in-the-mood-for/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/08/im-in-the-mood-for/comment-page-1/#comment-46206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 19:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=13038#comment-46206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, in spite of the info-overload delivery systems now in place, one does best to fall back on Theodore Sturgeon\&#039;s Law: \&quot;90% of everything is crap\&quot;...Speaking for myself, I limit the number of people I allow beyond my spam box to a controllable number, and cherrypick the good stuff as best I can. Ms. Amy is self-admitted pop-culture illiterate who\&#039;s honest enough to admit it, therefore it\&#039;s our job to give her something she can one-up her insufferable hipster friends with-my only footnote to my recommend being-watch this on a decent flatscreen, not on YouTube or your phone. With plenty of fried chicken takeout for your guests, of course!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in spite of the info-overload delivery systems now in place, one does best to fall back on Theodore Sturgeon\&#8217;s Law: \&#8221;90% of everything is crap\&#8221;&#8230;Speaking for myself, I limit the number of people I allow beyond my spam box to a controllable number, and cherrypick the good stuff as best I can. Ms. Amy is self-admitted pop-culture illiterate who\&#8217;s honest enough to admit it, therefore it\&#8217;s our job to give her something she can one-up her insufferable hipster friends with-my only footnote to my recommend being-watch this on a decent flatscreen, not on YouTube or your phone. With plenty of fried chicken takeout for your guests, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Eckel</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/08/im-in-the-mood-for/comment-page-1/#comment-46201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Eckel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=13038#comment-46201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where do you get your recommendations from? You know, this was less of a problem when there were only 3 or 4 television stations, studios put out only 85 films a year, and publishing houses turned out, what, 1000 books a year? Now, we have hundreds of channels, literally millions of new books each year and I-don&#039;t-know-how-many movies with Amazon, Netflix and the rest throwing in. Consequently, we now have everyone telling us what to read/watch/digest next. It used to just be Consumer Reports and the NYT Bestseller List. Now you have thousands of book blogs, youtube channels, Rotten Tomatoes, emails in your inbox, Goodreads&#039; ratings, God knows, everyone has a blog, Angie&#039;s List, Yelp, etc. There are more sources that review materials and tell us what to do than there were sources 20 years ago.

I&#039;m not saying the old times were better. But with tons of free books thrown at me every day, or all of Hollywood available for $1.63, going to the movies or choosing the next book has become a research project! Who can I believe when every day I get 60 people hawking their books, movies or TV shows--and all of them are &quot;great&quot;? 

I tend to fall back into pack mentality: if everyone is reading The Girl on the Train, maybe there&#039;s something to it. (And there is.) My friend says, read Cutting for Stone. Okay, I&#039;ll try it. That method&#039;s imperfect too I found after having the movie, Saw, recommended to me. So, now I watch the trailers, go to websites or Amazon to read first chapters, lean on friends whose taste match mine, or keep reading an author until s/he disappoints. These days, I no longer have any compunction jettisoning a book or ejecting a DVD when the first portion has proven unworthy. God knows, I&#039;ve even made mistakes trusting Tom Hanks. 

The thing is, no matter how many disappointments, no matter how overwhelming the job to choose wisely is, I continue to look for the next Fault in Our Stars, Eleanor &amp; Park, classic Bourne movie or Breaking Bad because that rare work of art that can transport me, exhilarate me and make me understand myself and the human condition a little differently is worth the trouble.

Next!

georgeeckel.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you get your recommendations from? You know, this was less of a problem when there were only 3 or 4 television stations, studios put out only 85 films a year, and publishing houses turned out, what, 1000 books a year? Now, we have hundreds of channels, literally millions of new books each year and I-don&#8217;t-know-how-many movies with Amazon, Netflix and the rest throwing in. Consequently, we now have everyone telling us what to read/watch/digest next. It used to just be Consumer Reports and the NYT Bestseller List. Now you have thousands of book blogs, youtube channels, Rotten Tomatoes, emails in your inbox, Goodreads&#8217; ratings, God knows, everyone has a blog, Angie&#8217;s List, Yelp, etc. There are more sources that review materials and tell us what to do than there were sources 20 years ago.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying the old times were better. But with tons of free books thrown at me every day, or all of Hollywood available for $1.63, going to the movies or choosing the next book has become a research project! Who can I believe when every day I get 60 people hawking their books, movies or TV shows&#8211;and all of them are &#8220;great&#8221;? </p>
<p>I tend to fall back into pack mentality: if everyone is reading The Girl on the Train, maybe there&#8217;s something to it. (And there is.) My friend says, read Cutting for Stone. Okay, I&#8217;ll try it. That method&#8217;s imperfect too I found after having the movie, Saw, recommended to me. So, now I watch the trailers, go to websites or Amazon to read first chapters, lean on friends whose taste match mine, or keep reading an author until s/he disappoints. These days, I no longer have any compunction jettisoning a book or ejecting a DVD when the first portion has proven unworthy. God knows, I&#8217;ve even made mistakes trusting Tom Hanks. </p>
<p>The thing is, no matter how many disappointments, no matter how overwhelming the job to choose wisely is, I continue to look for the next Fault in Our Stars, Eleanor &amp; Park, classic Bourne movie or Breaking Bad because that rare work of art that can transport me, exhilarate me and make me understand myself and the human condition a little differently is worth the trouble.</p>
<p>Next!</p>
<p>georgeeckel.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/08/im-in-the-mood-for/comment-page-1/#comment-46200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=13038#comment-46200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask Eric to locate a DVD of PHANTASM for you and grab the stuffiest, most humorless friend(s) you can find to watch it with you-classic 70\&#039;s horror/humor flick, came out right before HALLOWEEN and that whole genre. Also educational, because it\&#039;ll show you what guys looked, talked and sounded like in the Van Halen Era. Very atmospheric, totally autumnish, and goofily disoriented...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask Eric to locate a DVD of PHANTASM for you and grab the stuffiest, most humorless friend(s) you can find to watch it with you-classic 70\&#8217;s horror/humor flick, came out right before HALLOWEEN and that whole genre. Also educational, because it\&#8217;ll show you what guys looked, talked and sounded like in the Van Halen Era. Very atmospheric, totally autumnish, and goofily disoriented&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
