<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That special something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/that-special-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/that-special-something/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/that-special-something/comment-page-1/#comment-45712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=12656#comment-45712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I operate on the assumption that  read requests (and it&#039;s rare enough that a lot of agents even bother to reply to a query, however well presented) are like an audience with a 15th Century bishop; all decisions are final and irrevocable, Roma locuta, causa finita est. Don&#039;t waste their time with revision offers-ain&#039;t gonna happen. Of course, there&#039;s no law that says you can&#039;t run a different property their way later under a psuedonym later on, and if that goes nuclear pull you other prize out of the bag and say, &quot;By the way, I have this revised other property which happens to just be laying around..&quot; And if neither property gets off the ground, or they don&#039;t bother to reply to either query, remember W. C. Field&#039;s law of persistence: &quot;If at first you don&#039;t succeed, try, try, again. Then quit. No sense being a damn fool about it.&quot; There&#039;s always plenty other ports of call. And don&#039;t do like a writer I knew once and send people nyah,nyah,nyah, letters when you break through somewhere; kinda ruins the majesty of the occasion and causes your friends to haul you away in a straitjacket...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I operate on the assumption that  read requests (and it&#8217;s rare enough that a lot of agents even bother to reply to a query, however well presented) are like an audience with a 15th Century bishop; all decisions are final and irrevocable, Roma locuta, causa finita est. Don&#8217;t waste their time with revision offers-ain&#8217;t gonna happen. Of course, there&#8217;s no law that says you can&#8217;t run a different property their way later under a psuedonym later on, and if that goes nuclear pull you other prize out of the bag and say, &#8220;By the way, I have this revised other property which happens to just be laying around..&#8221; And if neither property gets off the ground, or they don&#8217;t bother to reply to either query, remember W. C. Field&#8217;s law of persistence: &#8220;If at first you don&#8217;t succeed, try, try, again. Then quit. No sense being a damn fool about it.&#8221; There&#8217;s always plenty other ports of call. And don&#8217;t do like a writer I knew once and send people nyah,nyah,nyah, letters when you break through somewhere; kinda ruins the majesty of the occasion and causes your friends to haul you away in a straitjacket&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
