<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Book, Two Book, Red Book, Blue Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/one-book-two-book-red-book-blue-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/one-book-two-book-red-book-blue-book/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2016/05/one-book-two-book-red-book-blue-book/comment-page-1/#comment-45852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=12793#comment-45852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the takeaway here is that buzz isn&#039;t controlled from the marketing end, although it can help; it&#039;s a writer&#039;s ability, conscious or accidental, to wavelength with the readers desire for entertainment and fly from there. And THEY&#039;RE the ones whose Facebook posts matter. As you said, it&#039;s easy to get into a tech dissection (sometimes I do it too) which sidetracks the question of whether a particular work is fun to read. That&#039;s why I keep a collection of Agatha Christies and old-school pulp lit like Conan the Barbarian around for slow brain periods; stuff that is so ridiculous it shouldn&#039;t work but for some mysterious reason is fun to read. (Although from my deck chair, Agatha Christie&#039;s THE BIG FOUR is by a far shot the silliest mystery ever written-makes Dennis Wheatley&#039;s THE SATANIST look downright thoughtful) It&#039;s not an exact science, by any means...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the takeaway here is that buzz isn&#8217;t controlled from the marketing end, although it can help; it&#8217;s a writer&#8217;s ability, conscious or accidental, to wavelength with the readers desire for entertainment and fly from there. And THEY&#8217;RE the ones whose Facebook posts matter. As you said, it&#8217;s easy to get into a tech dissection (sometimes I do it too) which sidetracks the question of whether a particular work is fun to read. That&#8217;s why I keep a collection of Agatha Christies and old-school pulp lit like Conan the Barbarian around for slow brain periods; stuff that is so ridiculous it shouldn&#8217;t work but for some mysterious reason is fun to read. (Although from my deck chair, Agatha Christie&#8217;s THE BIG FOUR is by a far shot the silliest mystery ever written-makes Dennis Wheatley&#8217;s THE SATANIST look downright thoughtful) It&#8217;s not an exact science, by any means&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
