<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Importance of Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2015/11/the-importance-of-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2015/11/the-importance-of-feedback/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. DaCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2015/11/the-importance-of-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-43638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. DaCosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=12112#comment-43638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you think thoughtful and respectful critique has changed your work? 
- It&#039;s reminded me that I&#039;m not infallible.
- It&#039;s forced me to communicate more clearly in my writing those things I want the reader to know - or not know.
- I learned that I don&#039;t &quot;have&quot; to make a change simply because my readers disliked something. After all, it is MY book; their negative reaction doesn&#039;t necessarily mean I am wrong. Sometimes it means I&#039;ve surprised them with a new idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you think thoughtful and respectful critique has changed your work?<br />
&#8211; It&#8217;s reminded me that I&#8217;m not infallible.<br />
&#8211; It&#8217;s forced me to communicate more clearly in my writing those things I want the reader to know &#8211; or not know.<br />
&#8211; I learned that I don&#8217;t &#8220;have&#8221; to make a change simply because my readers disliked something. After all, it is MY book; their negative reaction doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean I am wrong. Sometimes it means I&#8217;ve surprised them with a new idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2015/11/the-importance-of-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-43579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 20:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=12112#comment-43579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That should be &quot;going&quot;, not &quot;good&quot;; espresso typo...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be &#8220;going&#8221;, not &#8220;good&#8221;; espresso typo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2015/11/the-importance-of-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-43577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=12112#comment-43577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as the Scots used to say in the 17th Century, &quot;From ghoulies, ghosties,
long-legged beasties and envious rivals in a writers group, good Lord deliver us...&quot; One of the best fictionalized examples of this kind of dynamic is in Stephen King&#039;s novel IT from the mid-80&#039;s-you don&#039;t have to read the whole thing, just scan the first third of the book till you find the part where the writer character reminisces about his experience in a college writer&#039;s class-it&#039;s obviously based on King&#039;s actual life-while he endures the self-indulgent pretensions of his classmates, he actually has a marketable gift for stuff that isn&#039;t especially &quot;literary&quot; which the others find quite threatening; his instructor&#039;s fit of self-righteous rage when he sells a story the instructor bagged on is worth the price of the book. I&#039;ve sold enough stuff to know my abilities and tend to agree with the writers I&#039;ve met that the best agents are the ones who have no creative illusions about themselves; if Brian Epstein had   his own band he was trying to get off the ground when he met the Beatles, chances are history would have taken a serious wrong turn and no one would ever have heard of either of them. (The resulting nuclear war 5 years later is the sort of creative ad lib that a good writer should be able to produce on a moment&#039;s notice) So while I don&#039;t mind running my stuff by someone who looks at it from a money-making viewpoint, I&#039;m not good to invest my time with someone who&#039;ll merely be angry that it&#039;s better than his stuff or that the main characters aren&#039;t gluten-free vegans or whatever. Finding someone who&#039;s focused on connecting with a paying audience is what this game&#039;s all about, and sifts their prospects for the best stuff to make this happen, sorry for the lengthy sermon, hear my train a&#039;comin&#039;.............]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as the Scots used to say in the 17th Century, &#8220;From ghoulies, ghosties,<br />
long-legged beasties and envious rivals in a writers group, good Lord deliver us&#8230;&#8221; One of the best fictionalized examples of this kind of dynamic is in Stephen King&#8217;s novel IT from the mid-80&#8217;s-you don&#8217;t have to read the whole thing, just scan the first third of the book till you find the part where the writer character reminisces about his experience in a college writer&#8217;s class-it&#8217;s obviously based on King&#8217;s actual life-while he endures the self-indulgent pretensions of his classmates, he actually has a marketable gift for stuff that isn&#8217;t especially &#8220;literary&#8221; which the others find quite threatening; his instructor&#8217;s fit of self-righteous rage when he sells a story the instructor bagged on is worth the price of the book. I&#8217;ve sold enough stuff to know my abilities and tend to agree with the writers I&#8217;ve met that the best agents are the ones who have no creative illusions about themselves; if Brian Epstein had   his own band he was trying to get off the ground when he met the Beatles, chances are history would have taken a serious wrong turn and no one would ever have heard of either of them. (The resulting nuclear war 5 years later is the sort of creative ad lib that a good writer should be able to produce on a moment&#8217;s notice) So while I don&#8217;t mind running my stuff by someone who looks at it from a money-making viewpoint, I&#8217;m not good to invest my time with someone who&#8217;ll merely be angry that it&#8217;s better than his stuff or that the main characters aren&#8217;t gluten-free vegans or whatever. Finding someone who&#8217;s focused on connecting with a paying audience is what this game&#8217;s all about, and sifts their prospects for the best stuff to make this happen, sorry for the lengthy sermon, hear my train a&#8217;comin&#8217;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
