<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The name game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/09/the-name-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/09/the-name-game/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Lynd</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/09/the-name-game/comment-page-1/#comment-38575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Lynd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=10636#comment-38575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So now I wonder: if you have two pretty good titles for your manuscript, but with vastly different tones, should you offer both when you query? Perhaps in the final paragraph? Certainly once someone is a client they would share this and the agent could make the call for submitting to editors, but would just confuse the issue when shopping for an agent?

And while we&#039;re talking titles, let me ask this as well: Let&#039;s say you have significantly revised a manuscript, almost to the point where it&#039;s a new novel. (Story changes, POV, the whole banana.) (This one&#039;s not me, by the way.) Six months or a year later, with a new title, do you think it&#039;s okay to re-query agents who passed on the query the first go-round? This is assuming these are agents who asked for pages with the query.

Thanks! And congratulations to you both!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now I wonder: if you have two pretty good titles for your manuscript, but with vastly different tones, should you offer both when you query? Perhaps in the final paragraph? Certainly once someone is a client they would share this and the agent could make the call for submitting to editors, but would just confuse the issue when shopping for an agent?</p>
<p>And while we&#8217;re talking titles, let me ask this as well: Let&#8217;s say you have significantly revised a manuscript, almost to the point where it&#8217;s a new novel. (Story changes, POV, the whole banana.) (This one&#8217;s not me, by the way.) Six months or a year later, with a new title, do you think it&#8217;s okay to re-query agents who passed on the query the first go-round? This is assuming these are agents who asked for pages with the query.</p>
<p>Thanks! And congratulations to you both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
