<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweet, tweet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin A. Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin A. Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the crossed acronyms here; my CW meant &quot;conventional wisdom&quot;, which you&#039;ll admit hasn&#039;t had such a high winning streak lately...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the crossed acronyms here; my CW meant &#8220;conventional wisdom&#8221;, which you&#8217;ll admit hasn&#8217;t had such a high winning streak lately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough--after all, we all need to decide how to divide our time. (I&#039;m just glad commenting on my blog entry was worth yours!)  

I&#039;d argue that a) I blogged this into the void and you heard it, so it&#039;s not as hopeless as that metaphor implies, and b) assessing the content by the content-delivery system isn&#039;t necessarily going to give an accurate picture.  But I&#039;m saying this as a person who finds both social media and television have enriched my life, and I can see why anyone who hasn&#039;t found what they like in either medium might err on the side of caution.

There&#039;s room for us all, happily!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough&#8211;after all, we all need to decide how to divide our time. (I&#8217;m just glad commenting on my blog entry was worth yours!)  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d argue that a) I blogged this into the void and you heard it, so it&#8217;s not as hopeless as that metaphor implies, and b) assessing the content by the content-delivery system isn&#8217;t necessarily going to give an accurate picture.  But I&#8217;m saying this as a person who finds both social media and television have enriched my life, and I can see why anyone who hasn&#8217;t found what they like in either medium might err on the side of caution.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s room for us all, happily!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair points, but I think all social media now has the same kind of quantification.  I definitely have Facebook friends who are in it for Likes the way Twitter users go for the retweet/favorites, and the huge surge in photo meme posts that explicitly ask people to share to broaden a particular brand&#039;s reach (often radio stations, oddly) are a testament to the fact that Facebook&#039;s no safe haven from that gamification.  

I like social media, despite its flaws in that department.  There are some hilariously funny people out there trolling for my retweets.  I may not be willing to grant them the satisfaction very often, but it&#039;s not an unpleasant way to spend some time if you curate your feed wisely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair points, but I think all social media now has the same kind of quantification.  I definitely have Facebook friends who are in it for Likes the way Twitter users go for the retweet/favorites, and the huge surge in photo meme posts that explicitly ask people to share to broaden a particular brand&#8217;s reach (often radio stations, oddly) are a testament to the fact that Facebook&#8217;s no safe haven from that gamification.  </p>
<p>I like social media, despite its flaws in that department.  There are some hilariously funny people out there trolling for my retweets.  I may not be willing to grant them the satisfaction very often, but it&#8217;s not an unpleasant way to spend some time if you curate your feed wisely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, very good point!  I find it&#039;s often more useful for things that are tough to search--and to D.C.&#039;s point below, for me more useful than Facebook unless I want a particular demo&#039;s opinion.  My Facebook friends are from a narrower spectrum of the world than my Twitter followers, but that would obviously vary from person to person.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, very good point!  I find it&#8217;s often more useful for things that are tough to search&#8211;and to D.C.&#8217;s point below, for me more useful than Facebook unless I want a particular demo&#8217;s opinion.  My Facebook friends are from a narrower spectrum of the world than my Twitter followers, but that would obviously vary from person to person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the cocktail party comparison is spot-on.  All the same pitfalls, too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the cocktail party comparison is spot-on.  All the same pitfalls, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel compelled to note that VAMPIRE ACADEMY is the movie out now based on DGLM&#039;s own Richelle Mead&#039;s series of the same name, whereas the CW has THE VAMPIRE DIARIES, which is based on books from the early 90s. But if your point was that social media keeps television shows alive that would&#039;be been canceled years ago in a pre-social media world, I&#039;m in total agreement!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel compelled to note that VAMPIRE ACADEMY is the movie out now based on DGLM&#8217;s own Richelle Mead&#8217;s series of the same name, whereas the CW has THE VAMPIRE DIARIES, which is based on books from the early 90s. But if your point was that social media keeps television shows alive that would&#8217;be been canceled years ago in a pre-social media world, I&#8217;m in total agreement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some good points, but actually there&#039;s a tremendous amount of tweeting by people who read more than almost anyone. If you do ever join Twitter, you might find the #FridayReads hashtag to be to your liking!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points, but actually there&#8217;s a tremendous amount of tweeting by people who read more than almost anyone. If you do ever join Twitter, you might find the #FridayReads hashtag to be to your liking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. DaCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. DaCosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two thoughts:

- My time is too valuable to spend it reading short snippets of meaningless chatter from strangers.

- Twitter and Facebook and Blogging seem like standing on a cliff shouting into the wind and hoping that someone will somehow hear you.
(As Noel Coward said about television, these things are for appearing ON, not for looking AT.)

Maybe I&#039;m just a Luddite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts:</p>
<p>&#8211; My time is too valuable to spend it reading short snippets of meaningless chatter from strangers.</p>
<p>&#8211; Twitter and Facebook and Blogging seem like standing on a cliff shouting into the wind and hoping that someone will somehow hear you.<br />
(As Noel Coward said about television, these things are for appearing ON, not for looking AT.)</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just a Luddite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. DaCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. DaCosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  I just use Google, or check with Facebook friends who have lived there...or have relatives who do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I just use Google, or check with Facebook friends who have lived there&#8230;or have relatives who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2014/02/tweet-tweet/comment-page-1/#comment-37653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madison Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9764#comment-37653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Twitter for some things, but I usually unfollow writers who do nothing but promote their book. I also unfollow most who do nothing but Tweet via@ Tweets... forgot the name of that app but it sends out tweets from your account but it&#039;s really just a RT of someone else&#039;s tweet. I used to participate in it, but found it irritating even then and so I quit and began to quit following the ones who stayed with it.

Yes, I follow some of my favorite writers and I look forward to hearing about what they&#039;re doing. 

Mostly, though, I follow others who have similar interests as mine aside from my writing. I like to hear about homesteading issues, outdoors and nature things, and herbalism. I hope that the products I produce interest this same group of people. 

Most of what gets Tweeted by me are links to blog posts I&#039;ve made, and sometimes I do get into conversations with others. My first short story sale happened because of a Twitter chat with several magazine editors. But that was about communication, not about &quot;selling&quot; myself or my story. I asked about a need and an editor told me what she lacked in stories for her anthology. Then I set about filling that need and sold the story to her in the usual manner, but I think it was that initial conversation on Twitter that opened the door a bit more than it might have been otherwise.

I like to go the my feed and see what&#039;s there worthy of a RT, and I get discouraged when all I see is plain old self-promotion and very little interesting invitations to want to know more. I do tend to follow blog links that interest me and I&#039;d like to see more of that, but not if it&#039;s just to try and sell me a book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Twitter for some things, but I usually unfollow writers who do nothing but promote their book. I also unfollow most who do nothing but Tweet via@ Tweets&#8230; forgot the name of that app but it sends out tweets from your account but it&#8217;s really just a RT of someone else&#8217;s tweet. I used to participate in it, but found it irritating even then and so I quit and began to quit following the ones who stayed with it.</p>
<p>Yes, I follow some of my favorite writers and I look forward to hearing about what they&#8217;re doing. </p>
<p>Mostly, though, I follow others who have similar interests as mine aside from my writing. I like to hear about homesteading issues, outdoors and nature things, and herbalism. I hope that the products I produce interest this same group of people. </p>
<p>Most of what gets Tweeted by me are links to blog posts I&#8217;ve made, and sometimes I do get into conversations with others. My first short story sale happened because of a Twitter chat with several magazine editors. But that was about communication, not about &#8220;selling&#8221; myself or my story. I asked about a need and an editor told me what she lacked in stories for her anthology. Then I set about filling that need and sold the story to her in the usual manner, but I think it was that initial conversation on Twitter that opened the door a bit more than it might have been otherwise.</p>
<p>I like to go the my feed and see what&#8217;s there worthy of a RT, and I get discouraged when all I see is plain old self-promotion and very little interesting invitations to want to know more. I do tend to follow blog links that interest me and I&#8217;d like to see more of that, but not if it&#8217;s just to try and sell me a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
