<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing shorter is better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2013/09/writing-shorter-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2013/09/writing-shorter-is-better/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. DaCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2013/09/writing-shorter-is-better/comment-page-1/#comment-36623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. C. DaCosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=9192#comment-36623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would not say &quot;writing shorter is better&quot;.  I would say, &quot;Get to the point&quot;.  Short sentences are not better per se.  Avoiding unnecessary detail is.

The better writing lesson I ever had was in the Army.  Army correspondence is simple.  Here&#039;s a description of the standard arrangement:

Para. #1 -- This letter is about [subject].
Para. #2 -- This is the situation or problem.
Para. #3 -- This is how we need to fix it. (This includes either your plan of action or a request for assistance.)
Para. #4 (if necessary) -- These are the consequences of not addressing this issue.
Para. #5 -- If you have questions, contact [name and phone].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not say &#8220;writing shorter is better&#8221;.  I would say, &#8220;Get to the point&#8221;.  Short sentences are not better per se.  Avoiding unnecessary detail is.</p>
<p>The better writing lesson I ever had was in the Army.  Army correspondence is simple.  Here&#8217;s a description of the standard arrangement:</p>
<p>Para. #1 &#8212; This letter is about [subject].<br />
Para. #2 &#8212; This is the situation or problem.<br />
Para. #3 &#8212; This is how we need to fix it. (This includes either your plan of action or a request for assistance.)<br />
Para. #4 (if necessary) &#8212; These are the consequences of not addressing this issue.<br />
Para. #5 &#8212; If you have questions, contact [name and phone].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
