<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reining in the red pen.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/08/reining-in-the-red-pen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/08/reining-in-the-red-pen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Laughtin</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/08/reining-in-the-red-pen/comment-page-1/#comment-24761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristin Laughtin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=6473#comment-24761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my betas is a good friend (I know, &lt;i&gt;I know&lt;/i&gt;), and it&#039;s definitely a learning curve.  With us, lots of communication helps.  Rather than marking up the text too much, we&#039;ll note a few key things and then discuss in person (or online) the need for changes and why things aren&#039;t working.  Sometimes we phrase suggestions in a round-about, questioning way, like &quot;Were you trying to _____?  Maybe it would work better if you _____?&quot;.  It&#039;s more time-consuming and less direct, but feels less like we&#039;re imposing on each other.  This works well for us because we&#039;re both very interested in writing and have studied it, we&#039;re not just casual writers working on a whim, and we trust each other to be harsh as possible.  We&#039;re also not the only people reviewing each other&#039;s work.  Still, this arrangement wouldn&#039;t work with just any friend.  I actually have a harder time finding the line with friends who aren&#039;t as close, but that&#039;s because a couple of times it&#039;s resulted in an immature &quot;I don&#039;t care what you think&quot; response from people who won&#039;t take criticism well.

Stay safe this weekend!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my betas is a good friend (I know, <i>I know</i>), and it&#8217;s definitely a learning curve.  With us, lots of communication helps.  Rather than marking up the text too much, we&#8217;ll note a few key things and then discuss in person (or online) the need for changes and why things aren&#8217;t working.  Sometimes we phrase suggestions in a round-about, questioning way, like &#8220;Were you trying to _____?  Maybe it would work better if you _____?&#8221;.  It&#8217;s more time-consuming and less direct, but feels less like we&#8217;re imposing on each other.  This works well for us because we&#8217;re both very interested in writing and have studied it, we&#8217;re not just casual writers working on a whim, and we trust each other to be harsh as possible.  We&#8217;re also not the only people reviewing each other&#8217;s work.  Still, this arrangement wouldn&#8217;t work with just any friend.  I actually have a harder time finding the line with friends who aren&#8217;t as close, but that&#8217;s because a couple of times it&#8217;s resulted in an immature &#8220;I don&#8217;t care what you think&#8221; response from people who won&#8217;t take criticism well.</p>
<p>Stay safe this weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
