<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Influential women in the media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda B. Ontheshelves</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wanda B. Ontheshelves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 04:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Influential women-in-media (IWIM?) - I vote for Rachel Maddow, hopefully she will branch out with a few books (hint, hint).

Something I&#039;ve noticed locally:  The Mitch Albom phenomenon (via Wikipedia):  &quot;[Mitch Albom] is an American best-selling author, journalist, screenwriter, dramatist, radio and television broadcaster and musician. His books have sold over 30 million copies worldwide. Having achieved national recognition for his sports writing in the earlier part of his career, he is perhaps best known now for the inspirational stories and themes that weave through his books, plays and films.&quot;

And then there is Rochelle Riley, and before her, Susan Watson, both Detroit Free Press columnists (like Mitch Albom) - however, their careers have NOT blossomed into &quot;King of All Media&quot; complexity, as Albom&#039;s has.

Why?  Why no &quot;Queen of All Media&quot; title holders, aside from [perhaps] Martha Stewart, Oprah Winfrey, Arianna Huffington?  I mean, when you think of sheer cultural impact - doesn&#039;t the Rupert Murdoch/Roger Ailes duo beat out all IWIM&#039;s combined?

Can there be an IWIM version of Fox News...?  I feel embarrassed for Ms. Magazine...way back when, a friend&#039;s mother divorced, and started subscribing to Ms. Magazine...and I remember, Ms. had a certain &quot;tang&quot; to it - now Fox News is the one with the tang (to put it politely)...oh well, I&#039;m starting to ramble, thinking of the paneled family room in my friend&#039;s house, and the stacks and stacks of unpainted china in the basement, from her mother&#039;s pre-divorce, pre-feminist days...glowing like radioactive dinosaur eggs in the basement...to be dug up and repurposed by an insider trading, cupcake frosting media mogul decades later...the mysterious of life...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Influential women-in-media (IWIM?) &#8211; I vote for Rachel Maddow, hopefully she will branch out with a few books (hint, hint).</p>
<p>Something I&#8217;ve noticed locally:  The Mitch Albom phenomenon (via Wikipedia):  &#8220;[Mitch Albom] is an American best-selling author, journalist, screenwriter, dramatist, radio and television broadcaster and musician. His books have sold over 30 million copies worldwide. Having achieved national recognition for his sports writing in the earlier part of his career, he is perhaps best known now for the inspirational stories and themes that weave through his books, plays and films.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then there is Rochelle Riley, and before her, Susan Watson, both Detroit Free Press columnists (like Mitch Albom) &#8211; however, their careers have NOT blossomed into &#8220;King of All Media&#8221; complexity, as Albom&#8217;s has.</p>
<p>Why?  Why no &#8220;Queen of All Media&#8221; title holders, aside from [perhaps] Martha Stewart, Oprah Winfrey, Arianna Huffington?  I mean, when you think of sheer cultural impact &#8211; doesn&#8217;t the Rupert Murdoch/Roger Ailes duo beat out all IWIM&#8217;s combined?</p>
<p>Can there be an IWIM version of Fox News&#8230;?  I feel embarrassed for Ms. Magazine&#8230;way back when, a friend&#8217;s mother divorced, and started subscribing to Ms. Magazine&#8230;and I remember, Ms. had a certain &#8220;tang&#8221; to it &#8211; now Fox News is the one with the tang (to put it politely)&#8230;oh well, I&#8217;m starting to ramble, thinking of the paneled family room in my friend&#8217;s house, and the stacks and stacks of unpainted china in the basement, from her mother&#8217;s pre-divorce, pre-feminist days&#8230;glowing like radioactive dinosaur eggs in the basement&#8230;to be dug up and repurposed by an insider trading, cupcake frosting media mogul decades later&#8230;the mysterious of life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good comments, all. Who would you guys include on your own informal influential-women-in-media list, based on no hard data but your own preferences? My vote is Salon&#039;s Laura Miller. She doesn&#039;t have the reach of a Maureen Dowd or a Christiane Amanpour, but what she has to say (often about books) is intelligent and thoughtful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments, all. Who would you guys include on your own informal influential-women-in-media list, based on no hard data but your own preferences? My vote is Salon&#8217;s Laura Miller. She doesn&#8217;t have the reach of a Maureen Dowd or a Christiane Amanpour, but what she has to say (often about books) is intelligent and thoughtful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Field</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Field]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, there&#039;s still a lot of inequality out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, there&#8217;s still a lot of inequality out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda B. Ontheshelves</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wanda B. Ontheshelves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a delicious, juicy question! Alas, can&#039;t respond right away - there should be a name for it - comment fatigue - when you just don&#039;t have them &quot;oomph&quot; to respond (intelligently).  Have composed a little poem just now, for a certain cheesy state, one lake away from mine:

Rose are red
violets are blue
I wonder
what the h*** is wrong with this country
don&#039;t you

Now, women/media - that&#039;s going to take a little time.  But great observation!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a delicious, juicy question! Alas, can&#8217;t respond right away &#8211; there should be a name for it &#8211; comment fatigue &#8211; when you just don&#8217;t have them &#8220;oomph&#8221; to respond (intelligently).  Have composed a little poem just now, for a certain cheesy state, one lake away from mine:</p>
<p>Rose are red<br />
violets are blue<br />
I wonder<br />
what the h*** is wrong with this country<br />
don&#8217;t you</p>
<p>Now, women/media &#8211; that&#8217;s going to take a little time.  But great observation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Laughtin</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristin Laughtin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, both sides have some merit, or at least make me think.  In 2009, though, blogs were still taking off.  I wonder if her inclusion on the list was simply because of that: she wasn&#039;t anyone famous but because she used this crazy thing called a blog to connect to thousands of other moms, she gained a position of influence in the media.  In other words, perhaps she was included because she represented something of an anomaly.

At the same time, you&#039;re right, a male version of the list would not look the same.  There are very few, if any, women who have the same kind of power in the media as the figures you&#039;ve listed, and that needs to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, both sides have some merit, or at least make me think.  In 2009, though, blogs were still taking off.  I wonder if her inclusion on the list was simply because of that: she wasn&#8217;t anyone famous but because she used this crazy thing called a blog to connect to thousands of other moms, she gained a position of influence in the media.  In other words, perhaps she was included because she represented something of an anomaly.</p>
<p>At the same time, you&#8217;re right, a male version of the list would not look the same.  There are very few, if any, women who have the same kind of power in the media as the figures you&#8217;ve listed, and that needs to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Klem</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Klem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that people are generally turning away from the pretense of glamour (at least once they no longer have time to jump through hoops in a fair attempt at resembling idealized people)and seek, instead, for someone they can truly relate to. Being able to relate to a character - real or imagined - is affirming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that people are generally turning away from the pretense of glamour (at least once they no longer have time to jump through hoops in a fair attempt at resembling idealized people)and seek, instead, for someone they can truly relate to. Being able to relate to a character &#8211; real or imagined &#8211; is affirming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tricia</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2011/03/influential-women-in-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-21092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dystel.com/?p=5530#comment-21092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a 40 something female attorney. In my profession, men still sometimes call me &quot;sweetheart&quot;, etc. One older gentleman keeps telling me &quot;you&#039;re a good girl&quot;.  I just cring.  Unfortunately, it is part of what woman professionals face much too frequently.  I think we have a long way to go still.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a 40 something female attorney. In my profession, men still sometimes call me &#8220;sweetheart&#8221;, etc. One older gentleman keeps telling me &#8220;you&#8217;re a good girl&#8221;.  I just cring.  Unfortunately, it is part of what woman professionals face much too frequently.  I think we have a long way to go still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
