<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missed boats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Parkin</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-18996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Parkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://032453b.netsolhost.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/#comment-18996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, yes, it&#039;s easy to imagine a parallel universe where agents were number-crunchers who looked to maximise sales and left their own feelings out of their cold, cruel equations. They don&#039;t like what they&#039;re selling, but they know who&#039;ll publish it and how to get those people to buy it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, yes, it&#39;s easy to imagine a parallel universe where agents were number-crunchers who looked to maximise sales and left their own feelings out of their cold, cruel equations. They don&#39;t like what they&#39;re selling, but they know who&#39;ll publish it and how to get those people to buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clix</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-18992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://032453b.netsolhost.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/#comment-18992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hm. But would the project have been as successful without an agent/editor who DID &quot;fall in love&quot; with what was submitted?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. But would the project have been as successful without an agent/editor who DID &quot;fall in love&quot; with what was submitted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Parkin</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/comment-page-1/#comment-18981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Parkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://032453b.netsolhost.com/blog/2010/08/missed-boats/#comment-18981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It does seem to be an interesting distinction between agenting and a lot of other jobs, though - there are plenty of people in retail and the service industries who quite happily push products they haven&#039;t &#039;fallen in love&#039; with. I&#039;d go as far as to say that&#039;s the norm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agents don&#039;t seem to be anything like as cynical. It does seem to be quite common for an agent to turn down something they can see selling simply because it&#039;s not their cup of tea.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&#039;s maddeningly unscientific. Particularly when modern publishing and bookselling seems to be almost purely driven by numbers. Do Amazon &#039;love&#039; everything they sell? No. Could a small bookseller survive if they decided not to stock every big name author they don&#039;t personally love? Of course not. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So why are agents allowed to? I can think of a cynical explanation: the &#039;I fell in love&#039; line can only work so many times. To preserve the value of books imbued with agent love, an agent has to limit the number of times they declare that love. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I can think of a more Darwinian reason, too. Why do we buy a particular novel? Because we think we&#039;re going to like it, maybe even love it. So one of the selection criteria is that a book has to be lovable. So if one person, the agent, loves the book, that&#039;s a start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem to be an interesting distinction between agenting and a lot of other jobs, though &#8211; there are plenty of people in retail and the service industries who quite happily push products they haven&#39;t &#39;fallen in love&#39; with. I&#39;d go as far as to say that&#39;s the norm.</p>
<p>Agents don&#39;t seem to be anything like as cynical. It does seem to be quite common for an agent to turn down something they can see selling simply because it&#39;s not their cup of tea.</p>
<p>It&#39;s maddeningly unscientific. Particularly when modern publishing and bookselling seems to be almost purely driven by numbers. Do Amazon &#39;love&#39; everything they sell? No. Could a small bookseller survive if they decided not to stock every big name author they don&#39;t personally love? Of course not. </p>
<p>So why are agents allowed to? I can think of a cynical explanation: the &#39;I fell in love&#39; line can only work so many times. To preserve the value of books imbued with agent love, an agent has to limit the number of times they declare that love. </p>
<p>But I can think of a more Darwinian reason, too. Why do we buy a particular novel? Because we think we&#39;re going to like it, maybe even love it. So one of the selection criteria is that a book has to be lovable. So if one person, the agent, loves the book, that&#39;s a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
