<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big ebook news day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/07/big-ebook-news-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/07/big-ebook-news-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.15</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Parkin</title>
		<link>http://www.dystel.com/blog/2010/07/big-ebook-news-day/comment-page-1/#comment-18742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance Parkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://032453b.netsolhost.com/blog/2010/07/big-ebook-news-day/#comment-18742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see what would happen if a big name author (and their agent) decided to treat ebook rights like movie rights - I could see Apple v Amazon outbidding each other for the exclusive ebook of the new Stephen King, or even for just exclusive rights for the first month or two. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a world where the accountants have decided a Harry Potter movie that cost $150M to make and then earned $938M at the box office didn&#039;t make a profit (http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/studio-shame-even-harry-potter-pic-loses-money-because-of-warner-bros-phony-baloney-accounting/), I think there&#039;s plenty of room for ebook publishers to understate the revenue they&#039;re making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see what would happen if a big name author (and their agent) decided to treat ebook rights like movie rights &#8211; I could see Apple v Amazon outbidding each other for the exclusive ebook of the new Stephen King, or even for just exclusive rights for the first month or two. </p>
<p>In a world where the accountants have decided a Harry Potter movie that cost $150M to make and then earned $938M at the box office didn&#39;t make a profit (<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/studio-shame-even-harry-potter-pic-loses-money-because-of-warner-bros-phony-baloney-accounting/" rel="nofollow">http://www.deadline.com/2010/07/studio-shame-even-harry-potter-pic-loses-money-because-of-warner-bros-phony-baloney-accounting/</a>), I think there&#39;s plenty of room for ebook publishers to understate the revenue they&#39;re making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
