Writing Work-Out

It’s important, in writing (and I suppose in life in general) to know what your weaknesses are. Deep down, we all know what those might be, whether or not we ever own up to them, in public at least. Right off the bat, I know that my biggest weakness in writing—and I mean all writing, whether it be text messages, this blog, notebooks, let alone anything creative I might ever try my hand at—is writing too. darn. much.

Sometimes flowery, elegant, heavily detailed prose is perfectly acceptable, even necessary. That’s true for sure, and that’s certainly the type of writing that comes to mind first when I hear the critique that I have overwritten anything. But stereotypical, stodgy overdone prose isn’t the only kind of writing that needs to be pared back. Extraneous explanation, overuse of adjectives, adverbs, nouns and even verbs can take power and coherency away from a paragraph, essay or book.

The other day, I happened upon this handy little internet application: The Writer’s Diet.

While not completely infallible, it’s a great tool for getting a sense of just how many unnecessary words are muddling up your message. As a test, I ran some query letters through and wouldn’t you know, the letters that I had originally found most effective, enticing and intriguing were the ones that passed the test of leanness. The letters that I had less interest in were the more “heart attack” prone of my queries. Obviously, this isn’t going to be true across the board, but for me, it’s helped. I restrain myself a lot on this blog, you know, and I still tend to go on and on at odd times. It’s a habit I’m trying to break, and I think my writing is improving because of it.

Is this something that’s helpful to you? Test it out! See where you fall. What sort of bandaids have you discovered for your own writing weaknesses?


P.S. I ran this blog entry through the Writer’s Diet Test, and it definitely came up a little flabby…I’m working on it, guys!

6 Responses to Writing Work-Out

  1. Andrea says:

    That’s an interesting link, thanks for sharing!
    I ran a couple of paragraphs through the test and my writing for today (first draft) either got “flabby” or “needs toning”. But a scene from the same novel on which my writing instructor commented “very fluent and concise” came out as “lean”. I guess he’ll be pleased.

  2. Kellie Lovegrove says:

    Very cool link. Thanks so much for sharing. I ran a couple of scenes through and apparently I range from fit & trim to flabby. Definitely nice to see a different take on what I need to work on. But now I foresee another editing run in my future. Oh well, there’s always room for improvement, right 😉

  3. Laura Rueckert says:

    What a fun link – thanks! Having been labeled “wordy” by my last critique partner, I was pleasantly surprised to see I’ve pared down enough to now be “fit & trim”.

  4. I love this link…very helpful. Thanks you. Mostly I fell between ‘needs toning’ and ‘lean’. My flabby area is an area, where I already knew I needed help in. It was the ‘is, this, that, there’ wording…LOL.

  5. D. C. DaCosta says:

    I was pleased with my results, especially because I tried it on one of my longer and more flowery paragraphs.
    Looks like a handy tool. I wish the author of the last biography I read had used it.

  6. Fatih says:

    An impressive share, I just given this onto a cougaelle who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in fact bought me breakfast because I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>