Ten Years On (don’t worry, it’s not really about 9/11)

I don’t know about you all, but I’m pretty 9/11’d out. I’m looking forward to New York’s newspapers returning to non-remembrance cover stories—you know, the heartwarming stuff like the previous week’s “24 Shot in 24 Hours.” Certainly, those of us who were here don’t need a reminder in order to remember. That said, with all the talk of “ten years” later and the general consensus that publishing is in a time of CATASTROPHIC CHANGE!!!!, I admit to feeling mildly reflective. But maybe it’s just an autumn thing since just last week, Michael’s nostalgia-meter was set off by the back to school season.

As Michael mentioned, the more things change, the more they stay the same. We’ve heard repeatedly about the oncoming death of publishing. Audio books were declared dead. Fiction was declared dead. And the printed word in general? That’s died and come back more times than I can count. Publishers shuffled and reshuffled their imprints. Hundreds of people were laid off. Many of them abandoned publishing as it was going to pot. They were replaced by younger versions of themselves, some of whom are already abandoning ship to get into a more secure industry. Others will stick around forever. Erotica was going to be the next big thing for about half a second. Vampires were declared “over” before Twilight even hit the shelves. Chick-lit was all anyone was buying until no one would touch it. Several books that went to auction for six-figures were called “the last of a dying breed.” The plight of the midlist author was talked about endlessly by any midlist author whose books weren’t succeeding. And in this exact moment, ebooks are changing everything about everything. Except that they aren’t. The publishing industry has always existed to get work from authors to readers in its best and most profitable form. The heart of the industry was never in printing costs and paper stock—it was in the distribution of words and ideas. And listen, while I trust the internet for a lot of things, I don’t think crowdsourcing slush piles will be an effective way of deciding what books break out and what gets lost to the ether.

Long story short, I work in an industry that looks and feels different than it did ten years ago, but the essentials remain the same. I’ll keep looking for great books and working with authors to build the most creatively and financially successful careers that they can have.

3 Responses to Ten Years On (don’t worry, it’s not really about 9/11)

  1. RamseyH says:

    Amen x100. Change is constant in life, and we can either waste time worrying about how the old is passing away, or we can focus on embracing the future. Me, I love the future! I can’t wait to see what comes next! Stuff like this, for example, makes me so excited I want to dance!

  2. Catherine Whitney says:

    Too right, Jim. I have been around for the burial of publishing a few times now. I personally think technology will give/is giving publishing a new life. People are reading more, and that’s what matters. We can sort out the details of how, what and why as we go. There has also always been fadism on the bestseller lists. Nothing new there. Wonderful original writers still manage to break through, and odd, offbeat nonfiction tales still capture the masses. Bring it on.

  3. Ethan says:

    I have almost no professional qualifications for saying this, but I’ve always thought all the “death of publishing” talk was overblown. These days the prophets of doom have decided upon the Kindle as their vehicle of choice, but the bottom line is that people are never going to stop reading books.

    It was nice to read such an optimistic post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>