3

When literature and art combine

by Stephanie

Today, I wanted to talk about the soon to be published book by Jonathan Safran Foer, as covered in this piece from Vanity Fair. Tree of Codes is a fascinating work that Foer constructed by, well, deconstructing his favorite novel, The Street of Crocodiles by Bruno Schulz. What results is a visually beautiful work—die-cut paper that produces a Swiss cheese of sorts—that unites literature with conceptual art in a way that I find both weird and innovative. Foer points out that Tree of Codes is his own alternative to e-books, which is something I really took to. At a time when the physical book as we’ve known it seems to be drastically changing, I appreciate that Foer is, in a way, attempting to put forth his own reinterpretation of the book itself.

This is something I wish I would see more on bookshelves. While it’s doubtful that this art form is something that will ever take off, I can’t help appreciating what Foer is trying to do here. I think pushing the boundaries of a book’s physicality in a way such as this offers the reader a new and complex way of thinking about the printed word, or perhaps lack thereof. At the same time, though, is this just a gimmick? Is there enough practicality in its uniqueness to make it reproducible? Would people even care to see it again elsewhere? Maybe it’s just art for art’s sake; a piece of conceptual art meant to be seen, rather than a new way to think about creating literature. I love the creativity, and I love the high-concept production quality, but this might just be a one-hit wonder. What do you think?

3 Responses to When literature and art combine

  1. Kristin Laughtin says:

    I read about this yesterday, although I have not seen a copy of the book in person. Yes, it's gimmicky to me. It's a cool idea as an art project but I think everyone knows (including Foer) that it will never take off or prevent e-books from taking over the market. He even realizes that fewer people will buy it, especially given the higher price point. It's probably not reproducable; anyone attempting to do something similar will just look like they're copying.

    It is definitely cool art, though. As for whether it's good literature…well, like I said, I haven't seen it, so I haven't read it, but I wonder if the story stands up on its own. Is it a good story or will it only hold people's interest because of its form?

  2. Don says:

    It reminded me an awful lot of Tom Phillips's A Humument.

  3. Anonymous says:

    i agree don.

    the humument is now out as a fab ipad app by the way
    http://humument.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

Please type the characters of this captcha image in the input box

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>